entry 11 - 7/10/2026


I GOTTA TALK ABOUT TWIN PEAKS....ok i just got out of a ~2hr discussion about twin peaks with interested parties....but i'm gonna talk more i don't care. there may be twin peaks spoilers in this entry. beware. okkkk uhhh for context: i had seen twin peaks partially years ago when my brother was watching it but i had never given it my full attention let's just say. and ooooh surprise surprise i had to go to WASHINGTON. the US state. and i realized i had to watch twin peaks before then....it became absolutely urgent. i had 3 days to do this mind you. twin peaks season 1 and 2 are 24 hours long, almost exactly. i watched 24 hours of television in 3 days. mostly 2 days actually. i think i entered a sort of fugue state around the end of day 2. i've never watched that much television in my LIFE....i'm not sure i recommend it! i have my duties of course (#myduties) so i elected to miss out some sleep. watching twin peaks sleep deprived probably damaged my brain somehow. but enough about that.
ok well i guess i will elaborate on some points i was just making slash trying to make. for one i think i was led to believe that this show was much more complicated than it actually is. in the material sense, the story is literally just handed to you....i think the absurdist nature of the program leads people to believe that it's some sort of complex riddle that you must train in the swiss alps meditating under waterfalls for years before you can even BEGIN to comprehend. which. sure there's some vague bullshit thrown in there, and i'm SURE you could get really into analyzing the #meaning of the poems or the characters or the hidden symbolism. if you tried. but i think you'd kinda be missing the point.
this has been my experience with a lot of lynch's work i find. the main ideas of the story are very clearly communicated i think. you can interpret the stories different ways, but that's the case with any story. anyways. twin peaks is very obviously about sexual abuse within the family structure, and on a larger scale about the nature of 'good' and 'evil' with regards to the human condition. if bob is a pure, destructive evil...he represents that which purportedly lies within each man that drives them to commit crimes like murder and rape. this is stated outright. i think lynch is grappling with the idea that within all people is the capacity to do such evils, from the perspective of a normal person who is not inclined to. you might expect someone like leo or ben horne to do these things, but never leland palmer. from the perspective of someone 'untainted' or good, the drive to rape or kill is completely foreign (the foreign entity of the demon, bob), but you still know that you are capable of it. that is where the fear central to the philosophical stakes of the story comes from. people, specifically men in this story, do evil things. you can do evil things too. you, as someone unfamiliar with these 'evils', you are scared of your own capabilities. you don't know if somehow, at some point in your life, you will understand the wish to hurt people and give into it. you don't know if it can just creep up on you like that, if it's inevitable. if it could just suddenly take you over, like bob does to leland. and like leland does, if you will destroy the things you love.